当选2022年度十大新词 “新型实体企业”新在哪？******
12月20日，国家语言资源监测与研究中心、商务印书馆、光明网联合主办的“汉语盘点2022”活动揭晓了年度字词。其中，“新型实体企业”作为数实融合催生的企业新类别，当选2022年度十大新词。
无独有偶。在11月27日举办的中国企业家博鳌论坛“中国式现代化下的新型实体企业发展之路”研讨会上，中国企业评价协会发布了“2022新型实体企业100强”及发展报告，国家电网、京东、华为位居前三。
一时之间，“新型实体企业”被深度聚焦，成为经济领域最受关注的概念之一。事实上，新型实体企业虽然位列“2022年度十大新词”，但我们并不陌生，它已经融入我们生活的方方面面。以位居三甲的新型实体企业为例，国家电网深耕公用基础设施、保障生产生活用电，很多零售和消费背后都有京东的供应链在支持，华为则多年来都是高科技行业的领军者之一。新型实体企业科技含量高、数字技术能力强，是新时期经济发展和产业结构保持活力和张力的主力军，代表着一种更具创新性的实体经济生产力。
当今社会，无论经济形态、生产模式、行业生态如何变化，都不能离开实体经济这个内核，否则就成为了无源之水、无根之木。数字经济则起到为实体经济提质增效的作用，两者的深度融合、协同互促，最终为企业和国民经济发展输出不竭的动能。
新型实体企业的崛起，是时代的要求，也是时代的创造。传统实体产业转型升级，需要数字技术和创新力高效赋能，而数字经济的发展必须以实体经济为依托，才能挤压经济“泡沫”，避免“虚拟陷阱”。因此，在数实融合的大潮下，拥有传统实体基因、兼具数字技术能力的新型实体企业得以蓬勃发展，展现出强大的抗风险能力和成长性。
新型实体企业在技术先进性、生态普惠性等多个层面，都表现出其领先性，从而能够担当更多的社会责任。新时期定义的现代化企业，不仅要创造经济价值，更要创造社会价值，成为经济和社会发展坚实的支撑。来自中国企业评价协会的数据显示，新型实体企业百强2021年的总研发投入达6481亿元、新增发明专利5.6万件，呈现科技创新和产出双高的特点。巨额的研发投入，在实现自身科技创新的同时，对外输出数字技术服务，也能够助力千行百业生产工艺升级、经营效率提升。
开放、共享的服务，一如京东打造的“有责任的供应链”，惠及产业链上下游，创造了更多的商机和就业岗位。这样的例子比比皆是，国货老品牌，借助京东的数字化营销，重新焕发青春魅力；京东通过技术扶贫、技术下乡，再辅以智能物流，让大山里少为人知的土特产跨越地域屏障飞向千家万户，并走上了品牌化、规模化经营的大道；采用京东的C2M反向供应链服务，制造工厂能为用户精准画像，开发新产品的市场调研时间和上市周期大大缩短……
当选2022年度十大新词，有力地证明了新型实体企业的先进性，也是未来市场主体的主流形态。促进经济高质量发展，奔向共同富裕，需要深化数实融合，为新型实体企业创造和开拓更为广阔的空间。“苟日新，日日新，又日新”，相信未来必将开启一段充满信心和希望的经济新征程。（罗江海）
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 彩虹多多地图 |
